ABOUT OPEN MIKE

Mike Celizic

MSNBC.com contributor Mike Celizic provides his unique slant as he takes an offbeat look into the world of sports beyond the box scores.



Sometimes, cheaters don't prosper

Posted: Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:50 PM

We’re told as kids that cheaters never prosper, but as we grow up we have our doubts. This is no less true in sports, where the game’s narrative for too long has been about cheaters.

What’s strange is how few people seem to catch the moral of the story, which is that in the stories we tell, the cheaters always get caught.

Floyd Landis, the defrocked champion of the 2006 Tour de France, is the latest example. Though he fought with every bit of tenacity $2 million worth of legal fees will buy, a three-judge panel in France decided he’s guilty as charged of doping during the race.

Landis maintains his innocence, but so do most of the others caught over the years. All we have to go by is what the machines and the guys in the lab coats tell us, and that is that Landis had more testosterone in his system than nature provides.

We don’t know how many athletes cheat. But we do know that a lot of the top ones get caught, especially in cycling, track and field, swimming, weight-lifting and other Olympic sports. Even cheating coaches get caught, as the Bill Belichick sideline spying episode so recently showed.

Obviously, a lot get away with it. Everybody in track and field was convinced Florence Griffith-Joyner -- whose sprint records set in Seoul in 1988 have yet to be broken -- was cheating, but was never caught. That was the same year that Ben Johnson was stripped of his gold medal. And if one gets away and wins a gold medal to boot, others are going to follow.

The rewards are great -- riches and fame and free front=row tickets to the ESPYs. I guess to the athletes they seem worth the risks.

But is anything worth what happened to Landis or any of the dozens of other cheats in the Tour de France? Is it worth the disgrace of Ben Johnson? Is it worth even the half million dollar fine and the animosity Belichick reaped with his little sideline spying game?

Contrary to what your mother told you, cheaters sometimes prosper. But it seems that if you keep cheating, eventually it will catch up to you. Just ask Marion Jones. Once, the track star was worth millions. Today, she can’t even afford bus fare. And drug allegations made it all happen.

The only place where cheating doesn’t hurt players seems to be the NFL. Get banned for a month there for drugs, and you came back as big a hero as ever. Belichick may have been flayed in the court of public opinion, but Shawne Merriman is still a highly popular and praised linebacker for San Diego. It’s only if you get tossed for a year or more, as Ricky Williams did for marijuana and dietary supplements, that people get on your case.

But the bottom line is if you get caught, your professional life is pretty much over. In baseball, even if you don’t get caught because there are no rules against it and no testing for it, you have to go through life being labeled a cheat. Mark McGwire will never shake the rumors around his accomplishments, nor will Barry Bonds.

The rewards of winning are enormous, but so are the risks of cheating. I’d hope kids -- and adults -- would notice that. I’d hope they’d look at Landis, the latest person ruined by his own greed for victory, and say, ‘I don’t want that to be me.”

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

While he may be a cheater, the lack of chain of custody and testing protocol, raises to much doubt to convict.  The verdict even found that to be true.  There is just to much wrong with the lab and sampling procedures to equivically state he cheated.  I was stunned by the verdit.
I'm all for calling out athletes for cheating when they are caught. However what worries me is that there is an assumption that an athlete is guilty if one test turns up positive, even when backups turn up negative (as is the case with Marion Jones).

The fact of the matter is that labwork is not infallible. There are human beings with their failings and political leanings in the loop. Given Landis' strong denials I'm certainly questioning whether or not he really did cheat. Given Marion Jones' secondary, clean test, I'm certainly questioning whether or not she really did cheat.

Understand that the pendulum swings both ways. You can not catch cheaters and you can unfairly brand people as well.
wrong facts Celizic
3 judge panel was from Cali.
If you read the proceedings, the WADA evidence and the behavior of the USADA bordered on criminal. Landis may not be a saint but the French lab was incompetent and probably fraudulent.The results wouldn't stand up in small claims court in the US. Get off your high horse and quit the hypocrisy. By the way, lose the silly hat. you look like something from the 40's.
Celizik, I really hope you read the dissenting opinion on this case, and also spend some time over at trustbut.blogspot.com. You should also do some research on the prime arbitrator. He's no saint, either.

An honest (and not lazy) commentator would do some research, perhaps try to interview Landis, and maybe shoot for some 3rd-party objective opinions on the majority and dissent decisions posted. And perhaps you should go to Arnie Baker's website and purchase a copy of his book about the lab that did the testing. Would YOU trust this lab if you were an athlete? Cycling is not baseball, and LeMond is not always correct or in the know.

Do your homework. Then you can rant.
Landis was not shot down by "a three-judge panel in France" but by an American panel of three arbitrators, two of whom sided with the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency.
well, its not surprising, just look at football, what message are these cheaters sending to children?  i personally think Bill Bellechick should be suspended, shame on him and shame on Landis too....
one thing I have never grasped...if he tested negative in the first tests...how did he test positive for a substance which does not affect the short term...did he intentionally take something that works only after weeks?...I think cycling is in deep trouble not for any cheating, but for the fact that the French agencies are so totally incompetent.  I believe he is innocent..and always will. 2 of 3 arbitors..what a joke
The only problem with Floyd Landis is that the testing is flawed, they are not even 100% certain the two blood samples came from him. Additionally, the test used to identify the exogenous steroids is not a definitive test , and can not with 100% accuracy determine it.
If not all 3 members of the panel could conclude unanimously that he cheated, what on Earth is going on? There is enough suspicion cast over the methods of this French "lab" (they'd likely be put in jail in another country) that I'm open to the possibility that Landis didn't cheat. Best 2 out of 3 is not good enough to ruin someone's life. In the US, it takes 12 out of 12.
"Though he fought with every bit of tenacity $2 million worth of legal fees will buy, a three-judge panel in France decided he’s guilty as charged of doping during the race."

I thought it was The North American Court of Arbitration for Sport that handed down the decision, in a 2-1 vote. Two bad though; Floyd’s comeback on stage 17 of last year’s Tour would have been one of cycling’s greatest ever. If he doesn't appeal, which is likely, he's career is over: there will be a two year ban from the ProTour on top of the two year ban he already faces. The average career of an professional cyclist is only five years.

I find it ironic of course, in spite of recent events, cycling is probably one of the cleanest sports. If the  same standards that the UCI and ASO are applying to cycling were applied to American baseball, football, and, save us all, pro-wrestling, well, shortly there would be no baseball, football, or pro-wrestling. Strange that it's the PGA that's leading the anti-doping charge.
I think a more accurate premise is "if you a cheater who also happens to be disliked, your professional life is pretty much over." It is obvious to anyone with two eyes and even a modicum of steroid knowledge that just about all NFL players are doping. As a recent USC grad, I know for a fact that many college football stars are doping too. However, football seems to be doing quite well. The media asks no questions, and the public has made it America's most popular sport. As long as journalists continue to turn a blind eye to rampant doping in football while excoriating "cheaters" in other sports, articles like this are impossible to take seriously.
This is a sad day in sports...  Yes, the evidence indicated guilt, but I have a hard time believing Landis would have been foolish enough to cheat - IN THE MIDDLE OF THE TOUR.  Not before the race began, not for long stretches of time, but a single time.  In the middle of the tour?  With a substance that has virtually no immediate benefit?  Does that make sense?  No, it does not.  That is why I struggle with the test results and the ensuing legal circus.  I am not a conspiracy theorist by any stretch - typically it is used as a shroud of doubt for the guilty - but I am having a really hard time in this instance thinking that something else is afoot here.  For Landis, his career and his life's passion is over.  That is a sad state of affairs.
Get a life, you are the worst sports "reporter" in the history of time. Half of your articles are about how great the Yankees are and the other half make no sense at all.  This one is especially bad. Do you seriously think we should take this ruling at face value?  You didn't even mention that it was a split decision 2-1 and that any objective look at the evidence reveals that there's nothing incriminating there!
As long as we continue to reward Arnold Schwartzeneger for using steroids by electing him to governor... as long as we line up to worship Paris Hilton for making sex tapes… as long as we continue to let black men out of jail for double murders, we are sending a message that cheating is the best way.  Even if you are caught you will still be on television, you can write a book, and you can live in a fine lifestyle of infamy.
So the reward for achievement in sports today is to be labeled a cheater... Where do I sign up?
COME ON!!! I know this is what arbitrators get paid to do, but if you're going to let 2 guys on a 3-man panel tell you that he's a cheater, you need a headcheck. There's no question he has a case. Anyone who knows the system is WELL aware that if they ruled in his favor, the implications would have been horrendous. It was much easier to label him "guilty" and move on. Now there's only one victim. If they ruled in his favor, the sytem is the bad guy and it's a LOT harder to deal with that. I'm not decalring he's innocent, but he was convicted before he even had a chance to defend himself. Do your homework. He has a case.
There is at least one sport that knows what to do with
a cheat, strip him of what his cheating achieved. I sure wish Major League Baseball would follow suit. I unfortunately feel that Bud Selig does not have the courage to stand up and say Barry, Giambi, Mark, etc.,
you cheated we are striping you of your records.
Hmmmm..."“Today’s ruling is a victory for all clean athletes and everyone who values fair and honest competition,” U.S. Anti-Doping Agency CEO Travis Tygart said."  Does that sound like an impartial jurist, or a bureaucrat who needs to justify his position? Of course they have a 100% conviction rate - Have your seen how this democratic process works?:  Your guilty, We have the facts, Your can see some of them but certainly not everything we think we have, We dont have to disclose anything, And oh, by the way, WE NEVER LOOSE!!!    The REAL Facts: He passed every test until that DAY of the tour, had a solid history of proper behavior.  Then after ONE DAY on the junk he turns into SUPERMAN??..........  If you're buying this people, you really don't know the story.
the "the three judge panel" as you say were actually 3 arbitrators and the arbitration was held in Malibu, California, not France.  Only the head arbitrator was French.
I have watched the Tour for many years and I was watching live as Floyd won the stage that propelled him to the top of the podium for his race win. Le Tour has a doping problem, but this one is a farce. The French just did not want another American to win. There are too many facts that point to him being clean. I will always say Floyd won le tour, and in my mind he will always wear the yellow jersey no matter how many media naysayers there may be. Justice was not served in this case. Ride on Floyd!
No one ever realized how valuable 15 minutes of fame could actually be.  Born of cable, TV broadcast rights and ESPN is a never ending demand for Sports Content and starpower.  Chasing records and winning events brings a return on an athlete's physical investment that (in their minds) makes the risk of future ill health or just plain getting caught an acceptable risk.  Enforcement is in the hands of business managers who also share in the rewards.  No league or governing body has incentive to act until shamed into doing so.  The forms of cheating and not the practice will be with us for a long time.  And we will keep watching and buying.
Way to go Mike, take shots at a person who can't defend herself. Show some class.
It's depressing to see so many different views on cheating from the various sports leagues in this country.  Have we as a society lost our morals in trade for better entertainment?
Wow, you still don't get it. Don't feel too bad... of all the articles I've read about this, most of you don't get it. First, get the facts straight: his testosterone level was fine. At issue was a ratio of epitestosterone to testosterone. Also, the only thing decided by the panel was that two of them were able to ignore the the remarkably poor science involved, and one of them was not. We still know nothing. Did he dope? I don't know... no one has proved it. Given what they had to work with (an A and B sample that didn't even resemble *each other*), no one could. All that's been proven is that bad science will still be deemed an appropriate method to condemn athletes.

I'd love to root the dopers out of the sport and I cheer when one is shown the door properly, but I really think we ought to be able to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. It's science, for crying out loud: there should be no doubts with good quality practices. The Landis case had nothing *but* doubts, from the quality of the samples, to the ethics of the technicians, to the effectiveness of the machines, to the quality of the tests. We need to get it right.
Spare us your preaching - you neglect to mention that 1 of the 3 members of the arbitration panel found Landis innoncent and the French lab hideously incompetent.
I agree totally about the NFL.  Even the PGA is testing and no one suspects a problem there.  If someone wants to start the SFL (steroid football league) let them do all they want!
But what about overzealous officials at WADA and sporting offices? In the cycling world, these people are willing to throw out the baby with the bathwater...and are likely to ruin the careers of legitimate racer's careers (such as I believe happened to Floyd).  What about riders (i.e. employees) rights?  Dick Pound seems to have a mystic ball, and knows exactly who is and isn't cheating based on the direction of the wind.  A better testing and legal infrastructure is still needed for sports in which no viable employees union exists.
Great column--except for using the Landis case as an example of what happens to cheaters.  Despite what two of three arbitrators said, or perhaps because of what they said, we still don't know if Landis doped.  The arbitrators endorsed the bizarre notion that the lab's work was so flawed that if it happened again in the future, it was grounds to throw out the results--but not in this case.  Huh?  As a sports columnist, Mr. Celizic is in a unique postion to inform the rest of us.  Unfortunately he didn't in this case.  Perhaps he could actually study this case in depth, then tell the public what he thinks of the USADA/WADA business model of anti-doping.  That would truly be a great column.
Mike,

We cannot ascertain the guilt or innocence of Floyd Landis based on the available evidence.  The credibility of the French lab has been called into question.  The lab was shown to use shoddy lab techniques, to not follow proper procedures, and to not respect the chain of custody.  

Although the results of the carbon-isotope ratio test against Landis are clear, given the unprofessional and shoddy work by the lab, it is within the realm of possibility that someone inserted the synthetic testosterone into Landis' urine sample before testing it.

The best one can say is we don't know.  Landis should be given the benefit of the doubt.  It's a sad day for cycling all around.
Amen.
How come drug testing can catch Landis but failed to catch Barry Bonds? The answer is easy, Bonds didn't cheat.
Shame on all those who lied on him.
You are totally missing the point.  You say that we have to trust the guys in the lab coats.  The point of this hearing is that we can't trust them.  The reputation of the lab conducting the tests is the issue here.  You are being simple and not researching a topic before you write an article.  First of all you say that he was found with too much testosterone in his system...that ruling was thrown out in this hearing.  Did you not read the results from the hearing?  I guess not.  The third judge said that the exogenous testosterone test is much more complicated than the simple T-E test that was thrown out.  If LNDD can't complete the simple T-E test, how could they possibly complete the more complicated test?  Floyd may be guilty but you don't even come close to presenting a balanced story.
Once again the press misrepresents the truth. Landis did not have ‘more testosterone in his system than nature provides’. The tests that were conducted showed that he had a higher PERCENTAGE of testosterone than epitestosterone. In reality his testosterone was lower than normal.
Why would the arbitration panel say if there are a few more cases as shoddy as this one, then they would find for the defendant?  Either the lab work was competent or is wasn't, but they are pretty much saying it was not competent but they will let it slide this time. Absurd!
In response to:

Obviously, a lot get away with it. Everybody in track and field was convinced Florence Griffith-Joyner -- whose sprint records set in Seoul in 1988 have yet to be broken -- was cheating, but was never caught.

You should be ashamed of even saying such a thing about Flo-Jo just because she was great. If there is no evidence then why speculate? Does that mean that just because Michael Jordan was great that he MIGHT have cheated as well? Who next...Muhammad Ali, Tiger Woods, Wayne Gretzsky? Come on...be a real journalist and only speak to the facts...please.
If the processes used by "the guys in lab coats" were precise, and not subject to personal bias in interpretation, I'd agree with you. But there was no impartial jury here-- just three French judges. And I am convinced that the French are obsessed with discrediting ANY American cyclist that dares to win THEIR race (the only sport they are even halfway good at!) Put Floyd Landis, and his evidence, in front of an impartial, INTERNATIONAL, jury, and I'll accept whatever they say.
I feel bad for Landis.  Actually guilty or not, he's disgraced forever now.  But I think what angers me most is that the anti-doping authorities and labs are just as guilty of cheating as Landis.  They fail to follow their own protocols, leak positive tests constantly and don't even attempt to maintain the appearance of impartiality.  They are like jailhouse snitches but wearing labcoats and suits.
Please why are people so suprised that athletes cheat. Humans cheat it is in our nature, it all started in the garden of eden Adam and Eve thought they could eat the fruit and get away with it and the cycle has continued on from there! We have never been a highly moral country so why fake! In school I say about 80% of students have cheated at one point in time in their life, sad but true. The Government cheats the American people, and the American try to cheat the Government! So forget about a world where cheaters never win. It's a world where cheaters never get caught! The ones that do get caught aren't good enough cheaters like the majority. If we start pointing the finger at sports then we need to point it at every category of cheaters not just the athletes. Until then keep scrutinizing the ones that get caught and the praising the ones that don't and stop acting so suprised when you find out!
"The only place where cheating doesn’t hurt players seems to be the NFL."

And unfortunately, the NFL is way more popular with those that should hear this message (the kids) than track or cycling.  And unfortunately the message they're sending is one of second, third or forth chances and/or slaps on the wrist.
You speak as if you know so much about this topic.  Did you actually read any or all of the court transcripts or any or all of the test reports?  Or do you even know how the testing procedures occurred and how reliable they are?  I doubt it.  I, for one, don't know all of the information, so I wouldn't dare write such a pathetic news entry.
well-said.
A three judge panel in France? Do some research, it was the USADA panel that found him guilty 2-1.
Calling Landis a cheater is about as factual as stating that the three judge panel took place in France.  I know that it is unlike a reporter to let facts get in the way of a good story, but try a bit harder to learn about what you are writing about.
Horrible article that shows no understanding of the facts. Things as basic as the fact that the panel was not in "France" but actually done under a procedure by the US doping authorities pursuant to an arbitration held at Pepperdine University in Malibu, California make this article laughable. Personally, I don't know if Floyd did it or not, but, as an attorney, and after reading the arbitration panel's decision, I think that he got jobbed by a horribly written set of testing guidelines that (everyone seems to acknowledge... even the guys supporting the verdict) would cause this case to get laughed out of court if it were a criminal trial, and a narrow-minded panel. My take away from the proceedings (being relatively ambivalent about the outcome) is that once a doping authority calls you a doper, the WADA and USADA guidelines are set up in a way that would prevent you from exonerating yourself no matter how much evidence you showed to the contrary. Just look at all the quotes from the press releases.... which seem to all say something along the lines of "we acknowledge that we need to fix our labs, our testing protocols and our ability to keep things confidential when the doping code requires it, but we think that justice was done here and that Landis is guilty."

How about that for a story, Mike? If athletes are held to a higher standard, with a one-way outcome, why aren't the testing facilities and prosecution held to an equally high standard? That would seem to be much more interesting than the pollyannish tripe you served up with this one with the "bad guys always get it in the end" nonsense.
Those who choose this destructive path have no idea of the overall cost that includes the full intergrity of the sport that they claim to have a passion for. I used to be a great fan of Track and Field but I have since stopped watching it since there are so many cheaters out there. I ran track my self and always abided by the rules, and the thought of putting strange substances in my body even for glory scares me. The whole body of sports has become a muddy ball of confusion on parallel with professional wrestling and even worst "pitbull fighting." May "Sports" rests in peace!
Campbell Dissent Para 1:
"1. From the beginning, the Laboratoire National de Dépistage et du Dopage (“LNDD”) has not been trustworthy. In this case, at every stage of testing it failed to comply with the procedures and methods for testing required by the International Standards for Laboratories, Version 4.0, August 2004 (“ISL”) under the World Anti-Doping Code, 2003 (“WADA Code”). It also failed to abide by its legal and ethical obligations under the WADA Code. On the facts of this case, the LNDD should not be entrusted with Mr. Landis’ career."

please ... silly man in the cap ... you didn't get your job because you write anything smart ... you got your job because you knew somebody who knew somebody ... how many people can do your job ... and why did you get it?  GW is president because he's the smartest person im America?  C'mon be real?
Interesting article, it is apparent many of your readers are finding fault with your premise concerning the Landis situation.  I'm not a cycling fan, so I have not followed the events leading to Mr. Landis' current situation.  However, my bone of contention deals with your all inclusive arena of "cheaters".  While you specifically, indite athletes who use or have used some type of performance enhancing agent/drug, I agree, this type of covert activity, in my mind is most definitely cheating.  However, I don't agree that the Bill Belichick "video spying" incident falls into the same category.  Don't get me wrong, I believe what Belichick did was wrong, and I'm not totally convinced the Commissioner handed out the appropriate punishment.  What Belichick did was violated League Rules, however, he did it in a very open manner.  He did not attempt to conceal the activity, the camera was in the open, not concealed, the camera operator was in a shirt with a Patriot logo.  There was no cloak and dagger element to this event.  Ya, I'm a Patriots fan, but lets compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges.  Bill Belichick may have been arrogant in his approach to how he intended to abide by the Rules of the NFL, but, nevertheless, he did it in the open.          
because we don't understand science we tend to take it at face value. I once destroyed a drug test in court. Yes, the judge found him guilty anyway. Allowing me to win would destroy the integrity of the test.
Lives are being destroyed. Often there is a strong financial bond between the testing and enforcement agency. Admititng a mistake would lead to cancelled contracts. Too many people think that you merely place a sample in a machine and a bell goes off positive or negative. Most test require interpretation of an expert. Standards are set by those very people looking to make abuck off the machines and tests.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://openmike.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=372948