ABOUT OPEN MIKE

Mike Celizic

MSNBC.com contributor Mike Celizic provides his unique slant as he takes an offbeat look into the world of sports beyond the box scores.



No money's no excuse for not winning

Posted: Saturday, October 13, 2007 10:30 AM

Before George Steinbrenner goes crazy with the checkbook again come November, he might want to look at who’s still standing in October and who’s won titles in the six seasons since he last won the World Series. Rarely is it a big spender.

 

Of the four teams left in Major League Baseball’s playoffs, only one spent a great deal of money to get there. That’s Boston, whose $143-million payroll was second this year only to the Yankees’ $190 million.

 

None of the other three teams -- Cleveland, Colorado and Arizona -- spent more than $62 million. That was Cleveland, which stood 23rd of 30 teams in team payroll, according to annual figures compiled by USA Today. The Rockies were 25th at $54 million, and the D-Backs were one slot behind them at $52 million.

 

The Rockies, Indians and D-Backs together, then, spent about $168 million, $22 million less than the Yankees.

 

The jury is still out on whether the best way to get a championship is to buy it. If Boston wins its second World Series championship in four seasons, it will be a strong argument that money may not guarantee titles, but it sure does help.

 

Still, not many of the top spending teams got much for their bucks. In fact, the last time the two World Series participants were among the top ten spenders was in 2004 when Boston took the second-highest payroll into the Fall Classic and beat the Cards, who were ninth in spending.

 

This year, the top 10 put four teams in the playoffs, of which only Boston is still alive. The Yankees lost in the first round for the third straight year. The No. 3 big spenders, the Mets, engineered the greatest September collapses. Number 4 Anaheim, like the Yankees, was one-and-done. The next three teams, the White Sox, Dodgers and Mariners, missed the playoffs. The Cubs were next -- one-and-done, and the Tigers 10th.

 

Last year, the Cardinals won it all with the eleventh-highest salary, beating the Tigers, who were 14th in spending. In 2005, the White Sox won with the 12th-highest salary, beating the Astros, who were 13th.

 

In 2003, the top-spending Yankees were beaten by the Marlins, who were 25th in payroll.

 

The Angels spend a lot these days, but when they won in 2002, 14 teams spent more than they did, including the team they beat, the Giants, who were 10th in spending that year.

 

And then there’s 2001, the year the D-Backs won for the first time. The team they beat, the Yankees, were, as always, the biggest spenders in the game, but Arizona was pretty generous with the cash, too, taking the eighth-highest payroll into the postseason.

What’s interesting there is that Arizona had to dismantle much of that team -- it was too expensive for the market. It took six years to get back, but here they are.

 

Cleveland never won a World Series in its 90s heydey, but for seven seasons ending in 2001, the Indians were one of the game’s best teams. That team, too, got too expensive and was scattered to the winds. Now, six years later, they, like Arizona, are also back, which kind of sets your timeline for rebuilding through great farm systems. That also happens to be about the length of time it took the Marlins to go from champions in 1997 to dismantled the following year and back to champs in 2003.

 

There’s a lesson there, and it is that if your team hasn’t made the playoffs in 15 or 20 years, it’s not about the money; you’ve got lousy management. In fact, if you haven’t made it in 10, somebody’s not doing their job.

 

So if there’s an owner in Kansas City, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Tampa Bay, Washington, Texas, Baltimore, Toronto and a few other places reading this, stop taking excuses from your G.M. This year is proof again that you don’t have to break the bank to compete.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Excellent article. The topic brings me back to my college days when we would regularly argue over quantity vs. quality. He is exactly right, especially in a sport like baseball, where a 162 game season allows no "flash-in-the-pan" whiz teams a la the 2006 Saints. Of course, a balance is necessary, too, as that Beane fellow in Oakland will spend, but it has to be damned important because of the income problems at their stadium. You really have to appreciate the sublimities of the game, especially in October. Can Colorado win it all with an unprecedented run all the way to the top? Selig will cry if they do, because baseball at 5200 ft. elevation in late October will NOT be pretty. Talk about a home field advantage.
Might want to do a quick edit and fix this little error:

"In 2005, the White Sox won with the 13th-highest salary, beating the Astos, who were 13th."

I believe that Chicago had the 12th highest that year and Houston was 13th, but not entirally sure, but there is no way both had the same payroll though.

I agree with the article though, money may help you get to the post season, but that doesn't mean that you will win, just ask the big money losers this year, last year, and year before as well.
Mike - While a sky-high payroll doesn't guarantee a championship, it does basically guarantee a ticket to the playoff dance.  The Yankees and Boston are in the playoffs every year hoping that their collection of talent will turn into a team and win it all.

When was the last time Colorado or Cleveland was in the NLCS/ALCS?  1998 for Cleveland-never for Colorado.  Boston or New York is there every year and they cash the opportunity in enough to make the bet pay off.

So while the Cleveland's and Colorado's with their $60 million payrolls have to wait for the planets to line up just so and for the lightening to strike at the right time, Boston's and New York's payrolls ensure at least one of them a deep run in the playoffs every year.

So, while you write now that two low payrolls are deep into the playoffs, you’ll likely not have to type the words “Colorado Rockies” in any of your October columns for the next decade.  However, another mid- to low-payroll team like Milwaukee or Seattle will take their place as the final four Cinderella team.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://openmike.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=410103