ABOUT OPEN MIKE

Mike Celizic

MSNBC.com contributor Mike Celizic provides his unique slant as he takes an offbeat look into the world of sports beyond the box scores.



Norman has nothing left to prove

Posted: Sunday, July 20, 2008 10:10 AM

I yell at the TV a lot. I was at it again Sunday morning, inspired by the sage advice being offered Greg Norman by the analysts in the booth.

 

There were a mob of them on the broadcast, led by Tom Watson and Paul Azinger, both of whom were awfully good golfers. They're both pretty good guys. Still, I wanted to strangle them for their criticism of Norman.

 

They kept berating him for his club selection: No, Greg! Don't hit that driver! Hit an iron off the tee! Play it safe!

 

If this were the man who was still known as the Shark 12 years ago at Augusta, I would have agreed with them. That was the day Norman hocked up a six-stroke lead and lost the Masters to Nick "Fairways and Greens" Faldo. He played dumb that day, trying to make perfect shots when all he had to do was play smart.

 

The lead I wrote on my column after he lost was along the lines of: Watching Greg Norman tee it up in the final round of the Masters was like watching Janet Leigh get into the shower. (The line was provided by a Golf Digest writer who would probably want to remain anonymous. Being obliged to be nice to everybody, he couldnt use it and told me to go for it.)

 

He was 41 back then and still the best golfer on the planet. We had a right to get on him, especially with his record of losing majors in spectacular ways.

 

Its 12 years later and Norman is 53. When you get to that age and find yourself in the lead of a major against all expectations, including your own, you've got a right to play the course any damned way you like. If he wants to hit his putter off the tee, let him.

 

He no longer has to please anyone. He has nothing more to prove, nothing to lose, and nothing to apologize for. Win or lose, let him do it his way. And if he wanted to do his Janet Leigh impression, let him. When you qualify for AARP membership, you stop having to worry about what other people think.

 

I understand what the boys and girls in the booth were doing. Its their job to tell other people what to do. All of us in this business tell very successful people not only how to behave, but also how to play the games that we can play half as well as they do. Sometimes, we happen to be right. Sunday, the mob in the ABC booth at Royal Birkdale was dead wrong about Greg Norman.

 

There was even at least one occasion where they wailed piteously about Normans choice of driver that put him in the fescue. When his playing partner, Padraig Harrington, took an iron off the tee and put his shot in the hay, as well, they didnt say a word. They especially didn't say that no matter what you hit in that wind tunnel of a golf course you can still get in trouble.

 

I enjoyed the heck out of Norman's improbable run at the British Open. I never thought for a minute he'd win, and I didn't care. It was just fun watching an old guy whod just found a lot of happiness in his personal life find a little spark of what he used to be.

 

When he was young and the best talent on Tour, he could be an arrogant twit. A lot of people didn't like him. He came back mellow and content and just happy to be here. And he gave us one more thrilling show.

 

Some people who care more for personalities than the game wondered what would be the purpose of watching the British Open without Tiger Woods in the field. Greg Norman provided the answer.

 

Be grateful for the show he put on. And quit telling him how to play the game.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

What kind of sport is it that a 53 year old guy who is probably a little worn down from his honeymoon can go out there and be in the lead of a major championship 3/4ths of the way through?  That is incredible!  Anyone who criticizes him for having a "bad" day, shooting a 7 over par in those conditions, at his age is nuts!  
Right on. Iron off the tee was no guarantee of the fairway as was clearly demonstrated over and over again. How stupid to suggest Norman was trying to birdie every hole. I thought Norman's strategy was great! If I'm going to miss the fairway, let it be 100 yards out, not 200 from the green. Great to see a legend play it his way. In fact, when he reverted to the iron off the tee it seemed to mark a sort of resignation. He didn't appear to carry the same demeanor, probably feeling pressured to change his strategy to suit naysayers not because he really thought it best. It was a great run and a real pleasure to watch him compete. Hope there's more left in the tank.
You expressed my feelings exactly.  And I got totally fed up with their repeating his record of failure at majors.  And they had the nerve to compare this loss to those failures.  He didn't failed here.  For a 53-year-old man to lead the British Open for 3 days is a winner in every sense of the word.  Good for you Greg Norman and may you do as well in the Senior Open next week.
i did not like norman before he lost the masters to faldo but after watching how he handled it all and this loss today as well, it is clear to me that norman is winning in the game of life despite not having all of the major championships he could have had. i believe he is a much better person now than before.
AMEN!  Some days i wonder why we have 'color guys' in the booth - i watch the same game they do but i seem to be able to keep my mouth shut!  Greg - i love you no matter what happens or which club you choose
What kind of sport is it that a 53 year old guy who is probably a little worn down from his honeymoon can go out there and be in the lead of a major championship 3/4ths of the way through?  That is incredible!  Anyone who criticizes him for having a "bad" day, shooting a 7 over par in those conditions, at his age is nuts!  
Here, here....
53 years old.....tied for 3rd in the British Open.....Game, Set, Match........great job Mate!!
I agree with you all the way, Hats off to Greg Norman, it was fun to watch.
Yeah, he choked so bad that he ended up tied for third in arguably the hardest tournement on the tour at the age of 53, he should be ashamed of himself.  Describing someone at 53 tying for third in this tournament with any word resembling choke is absurd.  He's lucky to make the cut at 53.  Ask Vijay Singh.  I think he would have been happy to have choked as bad as Norman.  To Greg Norman, I say bravo!!! You rock!!!

Bravo!!
The Janet Leigh comment could only have come from Dan Jenkins, the funniest guy anywhere.
And I got pretty tired of the analysis also.  Let him play, for Pete's sake.
Back in the '80's I loved watching Norman.  He brought fun to golf.  He brought excitement to golf. He inspired. To see him competing at this year's Open was fantastic, and I was right there glued to the TV (could've been out salmon fishing), but this may have been a once in a lifetime chance to see one of my idols play on the big stage again.  At 53 he played his way with the swagger that created "The Shark".  So he didn't win. I wouldn't have missed it.  As a 40 something, he inspired me even more for my game. Thanks again for playing the game with heart and making the game interesting again Greg. Priceless.
I normally don't agree with a lot of mikes opinions as I think they are often sanctamonious, but this time he was   right on the money
Totally agree that 53 yr.old Norman put all the 'Young Uns'advice to shame, particularly from Azinger who ought to have known better. Judy Rankine said it best having seen Norman in his glory days, he certainly played almost as well today as he did 20 or so years ago. Thanks Greg for a wonderful display, even Tiger would have been stretched.


Here, here....
It was fun watching Norman play, Who didn't think he was going to choke though?  Golf without Tiger?  Didn't matter stiil fun to watch and had no idea who would win.  What about Rocco in the early rounds?  Good stuff.
It is comments like this that may make the man stop playing. Instead the media brings up his shortcomings.
Celebrate his achievments, not his shortcomings!
Well said! I'm not a golfer but I loved every minute of watching Greg Norman play again! He is a pleasure to watch. Quite frankly I only watched when he was playing!
If the Shark had played a little bit smarter and used a 3 wood as opposed to a driver he could have been in the running at the end
Exactly!  There was one moment where one of the announcers said, "I think this is the decision Norman will look back and regret" (about selecting driver).  My reaction was, "BS!"  He's out there in a tournament he never expected to play, let alone lead.  He's enjoying the game at its most basic level!  Do you really think he's winding up his honeymoon saying, "Jeez, Chris, I can't believe I hit driver on #13?"  I highly doubt it.  Given his press comments all week, I think instead he's looking at all the other chumps out there who fade into obscurity and realizing that his innate natural ability can still manufacture greatness.  Look out Senior Tour!
It was wonderful to see Greg Norman playing again and in the lead at a Major!  Wow!  He's a terrific competitor and a joy to watch; and I agree with you, let him play however he wants to play.  At 53, leading the British Open, he's earned that right.
You hit the ball squarely on the screws ... hard to tell if Azinger was just trying to find his place as a broadcaster; if he felt he had to be the Johnny Miller this week or if his official ABC role was the skeptic, but he acted like an idiot today.  Greg Norman played a fantastic Open under the most difficult of conditions of any major ever.  I too noticed the irony in Harrington ( very classy Champion btw) missing the fairway badly with a iron while Norman was mocked for hitting driver for the umpteenth time. I too cursed the TV every time Azinger opened his mouth, which is disappointing given his role in the upcoming Ryder Cup.  Judy Rankin repeatedly mentioned how comfortable Norman was with his driver and the good shots he hit all week with it ... why would anyone change course?  Azinger, you should be ashamed.
I'm not a golfer, but I loved seeing an elder statesman step up when Phil, Sergio, etc. didn't. More power to you, and will be looking for you at the "seniors".  dee
I got tired of Azinger mentioning and criticizing Norman for the use of the driver. How many majors has Azinger won??? or even finished second. Instead of applauding Norman for his accomplishments at the age of 53 and being able to compete in such a pressure situation, there was too much negativity.
Good for Norman.  He stated going into the tourney that he held no expectations for himself.  If anyone was told that he'd finish tied for third, he would have ben quite thrilled, for sure.  Undoubtedly, a storybook ending would have had him win the whole thing.  To see him in contention each day was fantastic, and made me hope that it would not be the last we see of him for a while.

Arm chair quarterbacks, including Zinger, should simple revel in the moment much like we did during Jack's last win at Augusta, or round at St. Andrews.  Greg Norman has done a lot for the game along his teaching series with Butch Harmon collectively cemented my respect for the game and them.

Critics should appreciate his recent accomplishment (not the marriage with Chrissie - which is equally great!) and look forward to his next installment.  Norman is a class act.
Norman did the best he could on those so called golf courses they play the British open.More like bombed out bombing sites. Why complain about his club selection,fans want to see Tiger go for homeruns.Same for Norman.That course with wind burial sites for sand traps&3ft hay off fairways  and greens arrows not hold, need rocket launcher for driver. Gave us old duffers something to dream about.Play on Greg
I think this is first column you have ever  written that I actually agree with.  Well said.  
As an avid fan of Greg Norman I was thrilled to see him at the British Open - and on his honeymoon to boot!! Greg didn't really care if he won or lost, he was there to have fun and he did as well as those of us who were rooting for him.  It is totally ridiculous that the announcers kept "harping" on his age of 53 while he was keeping up with the "kids" playing under the same wind blown circumstances and it was an absolute joy to see a 53 year old champion tie for third in a championship where so many "younger upcomers" didn't and couldn't do diddly squat.  Hooray for seniors, especially those with the stamina to continue.  
While Norman made what I think were some bad decisions today, what most people apparently don't realize is what an incredible accomplishment this was! Never mind his age--he's probably in better physical shape today than he was several years ago when bothered with back & hip problems. And he's most likely in better shape than 50% of the guys on tour. No, what's simply incredible is that a guy who plays fewer than a dozen competitive tournaments a year and who doesn't practice much could go out and play like he did! That shows the awesome talent this guy has; one can only imagine what the story might have been if he had practiced and played more in recent months. Really an amazing feat.
Right on and great article!  This was the most enjoyable major to watch for me in the last 5-6 years until, finally, at Hole 16 when I knew it was over for Norman. He faced his demons from past majors after his beginning bogey run and was still in contention late into the back nine.  What a flashback, no Tiger and here's Greg Norman.  

Mr. Watson struggled in the booth more than Norman did on the course.  Paul Azinger, even though he heavily criticized Norman, seemed in awe of everything Norman has accomplished on and off the course.  How could he or Watson not be in awe but why so much criticism?

Unfortunately, history repeated itself - not Norman's, but the history of the aging, great golfer (Nicklaus and the second Master's run in '98, Hogan,Palmer, and Watson all had theirs) that looks to have one more major in them only to fall short due to life's other ambitions, diminishing skills, or the run of great golf by another.

How many people were thrown by the continued typo of ABC for listing one of Norman's 54 Hole leads as the 2006 Master's instead of '96 during the final round coverage?

I can't wait for the 2009 Master's when Greg Norman returns.  ABC's best coverage of the day was finding the kid still in Greg Norman when he was informed he would be invited back to Augusta in 2009!
Mike, I totally agree with you about Greg Norman. I'm an American expat working in Oman, so we got all day coverage of the Open from BBC. They were FAR less critical from how you were saying the American bradcasters were. Although on occassion, they too did question his club selection. But in the end, they praised him for making a Tiger-less Open still a great Open to watch.
To be 53 and in the mix at a major just shows how perfectly content Norman is at this point in his life. By the way. It also shows just how talented a player Norman is, even at 53 and playing almost zero golf. Watson knows better. Azinger finished in what place in the open!!!!!!
You've got to love the Shark, both for his ups and downs in his career.  In his prime, I think he owned one of the most powerful swings in golf history, perhaps even more powerful than Tiger's.  As for his thrilling charge at this year's Open Championship, all I have to say is that Chris Evert may deserve some credit for his valiant effort.  I would have loved to see him win.  
Spot on!  Good on ya, Mike!
Agreed... but explainable.  He had an actual chance to win.  Everyone expected the fade on day 3 but he emerged with a 2 stroke lead.  I have empathy with the golfing commentators, many of whom are age peers of Norman's and were simply expressing their own opinions of what they would do.  Watching him swing from his back foot hole after hole with a driver was tough.  Reflecting back...sure he had a right to hit a putter from the tee but you're evaluating the guys who were watching him throw it away in real time and chiding them for not being looser.  Can you understand Watson and Azinger...guys who would sell a toe to be in the same position at their ages, freaking out?  I can.    
Anyone who's a golfer knew that Greg was on borrowed time. For the first 3 rounds he made everything (10-15 footers) while Sunday he made nothing! The 35 mph breeze also took care of any shot not struck perfectly. As for Azinger, it was obvious he still harbours a grudge toward the Shark for their run in 20 years ago! He can't even get in The Open!
Finally!!!  You are the first and hopefully not the last to say what a bunch of meatheads Watson and Azinger were.  Here's a fifty-three year old guy who hasn't played competitively in years and hasn't participated in a major in three years.  Let him play whatever damn club he wants and just enjoy the show.  TIGER WHO?  This was the most enjoyable golf tournament I watched in ages.  Thanks for the memories Greg!!!
I totally agree with your article!
I was a fan of Norman in years past and he was a great player and still is pretty good as he proved this past weekend.
I enjoyed watching him play this major tournament and was quite turned off by the broadcasters. He got to be the leader on the final day by making club choices the prior three days and had great success on a very hard course! I didn't care to listen to commentators who second guess every decision and because of them I turned the channel more then once. I would wait awhile and turn back to see how Greg was doing.
This was a good weekend of golf despite not having the best player in the world able to complete. Mr. Tiger Woods! It would have been more enjoyable to watch and listen with a more professional broadcasting crew!
right on. If this game depends on one golfer (tiger) to keep it going, were in trouble.
I had a great time watching Greg Norman yesterday - I usually don't follow golf, but I love rooting for folks my age that are still out there. He did a wonderful job, playing with folks half his age. He didn't play it safe, because that's how he is. Life shouldn't be safe - it should be enjoyed!
Do not worry Greg you will get them next time.  Oh that’s right, odds are that you will not.
right on.  norman was great
Same old "Great White Carp", had a major on the line and spit out the hook.
I agree totally!!!   Let the man (and his wife) have a life!!!  How many of those making these dumb remarks could have tied for third?
I think ABC did an absolutely horrible job on the telecast. They were on the air @ 40 minutes and showed (2) shots. C'mon I wanted to watch golf - not listen to (2) guys that had no business in the broadcast booth.
for once, i finally agree with you.
I agree with you on this one!
Tom Watson must have been using more wrong clubs than The Shark, he didn't even make the cut, Paul Azinger did not even play (I think they had Shark Envy, if you can't beat him berate him). Wonder what the rating would have been without Greg Norman, he was the show. I agree with Mike, Greg Norman has nothing to prove and if we keep throwing the Masters in his face we may never get a change to watch him put on a great show again.
It was an absolute pleasure to watch Greg Norman over the weekend.  It was so good to remember that there were greats before Tiger and will be after him. Norman was always a classy golfer, "win or lose" and it's great to see him enjoying his newfound happiness.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://openmike.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1210781