ABOUT OPEN MIKE

Mike Celizic

MSNBC.com contributor Mike Celizic provides his unique slant as he takes an offbeat look into the world of sports beyond the box scores.



Goodell is right to lean on Packers

Posted: Thursday, July 24, 2008 1:18 PM

The Brett Favre morass is an embarrassment for Green Bay and Favre and the kind of publicity the NFL doesn’t think it needs. And for those reasons, you have to congratulate commissioner Roger Goodell for leaning on the team to move their un-retiring quarterback to another team and end the madness.

 

Personally, I don’t see Green Bay’s problem as being one for the league. While it’s messy, it’s also generating a ton of publicity every day. And the first rule of public relations is it doesn’t matter what’s being said about you as long as they spell your name right. The only bad publicity is no publicity.

 

For any fan outside of Green Bay, l’affaire Favre is wonderful theater. For haters of the green and gold, it’s probably also delightfully entertaining. It’s also clean fun. It’s not about drugs or exotic dancers. It’s about a legendary player who wants to come out of retirement for a team that doesn’t want him around anymore.

 

While I’m perfectly happy to let the melodrama play itself out, I fully understand why Goodell wants it to go away. No sport more carefully guards its image and attempts to stage manage everything and everybody. To Goodell, the stalemate between team and quarterback reflects poorly on the league.

 

There is precedent for a commissioner giving a team advice that borders on an order. Way back in 1979, Pete Rozelle told the Mara family to hire a competent general manager to end years of losing in New York. Rozelle even suggested a candidate – George Young. The Giants took the hint, hired Young, and built a Super Bowl champion.

 

I’ve often wished that commissioners would do that more often. Somebody, for instance, should tell Al Davis to stop trying to run the Raiders. The Bidwill family should be ordered to either build a winning team in Arizona or sell the Cardinals. They’ve had something like 50 years to win something. That should be time enough.

 

I don’t expect either of those scenarios to come to pass any time soon. But it is a good sign that Goodell is willing to get his hands dirty and do what he can to help solve embarrassing situations. It may be bad for writers and broadcasters to get this settled, but it’s good for Goodell’s vision of what the NFL ought to be.

 

He’s also right. Green Bay has to get Favre out of town as soon as possible. The controversy can’t be doing Aaron Rodgers any good, and it’s a huge distraction for the entire team as it heads to camp. The last thing the Packers need to see when they put on the pads is Favre showing up, as he’s threatened to do.

 

The team also doesn’t need to get sucked up into possible tampering charges involving the Vikings. Goodell will doubtless be heard on that issue, too.

 

The Packers understandably want something in return for Favre, but I’d be very tempted to simply give him his outright release. There’s danger in that. He could show up in Chicago or another division rival, which the Packers don’t want to happen. But to trade him, they have to get his approval, and this could stretch on for weeks. This may be one of those cases where you swallow hard, cut your losses and tear up his contract.

 

He’s got to go, and the sooner the better. Goodell understands that. It remains to be seen if the Packers do.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

That's the dumbest thing you've ever said. And that's a tough list to top. So you're saying that the Packers should, solely out of convenience, let Favre go to a divisional rival? Just so Ted Thompson can spend more time doing what exactly? And to lower the distraction on the team for what? For the all-important pre-training camp period? Please....for once, use your brains. Dumb dumb dumb comment.
Why should the Packers cave here they are entitled to get something in return for Favre? Pressure from Goodell reduces their bargaining power with other teams. I also don't understand why this is embarrassing for the league. Favre's indecision about his retirement got everyone where they are today... on the other hand, he is likely would be one of the
top 10 QBs in the league next year, so perhaps the Pack should man up and keep him.
I've been a Packer's fan for forty years.  I've appreciated and respected what Brett has doen for the team.  However, he is not the be all and end all of the Packers.  If he wants to play, then he should ask to be traded.  And, the packers are within their right to apporve or deny which team the trade might be,  Certainly, with the Packers holding his contract, they are due compensation for a trade.
Brett should not have had his tearful retirement announcement as he did, if he wasn't sincere.  
Why is Goodell even involved in managing the affairs of the team.  The Packers are right to hold onto Favre until they can receive decent compensation for him.  Why not hold onto him until Week 3 or 4 when inevitably a quarterback will go down, and a veteran player like Favre will be worth a 2nd and 3rd round instead of a 2nd and 6th or 3rd and 7th round pick.  This is an internal situation within the Packer organization it does not effect the rest of the league.  The Packers should and will do what is in their best interest and if they see that includes holding onto a quarterback acting like a spoiled kid, it is their right to do so.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://openmike.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1220608