ABOUT OPEN MIKE

Mike Celizic

NBCSports.com contributor Mike Celizic provides his unique slant as he takes an offbeat look into the world of sports beyond the box scores.



Breathing easy

Posted: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 7:51 AM

After a one-day absence, the smog stomped in on big dragon’s feet again today. It wasn’t as bad as it had been on Monday, but it was bad enough to prompt another round of debate about whether Beijing’s now-famous inversion layer is going to ruin the Games.

 

May I suggest that we all get a grip, including those American cyclists who deplaned in Beijing on Tuesday wearing black masks as if they were here to rob a bank instead of compete in the Olympics.

 

I understand athletes being concerned about pollution. When races are won by thousandths of a second, you don’t want to reduce your lung capacity by a single molecule. But these guys should have looked out the airplane window before they landed. It was a wonderfully clear day.

 

Beijing’s inversion layer is like nothing I’ve ever experienced. It doesn’t have an acrid odor like air I’ve encountered in the past in New York, Los Angeles and more recently in Phoenix. It also doesn’t leave you feeling congested or make you feel like you’re not getting any air, a feeling I’ve had in Houston. And the next morning, you’re not excavating black boogers, as was the case in Athens, where the air was heavy with dust during the 2004 Games.

 

The athletes who have been here for a while haven’t complained, either. “I haven’t had any breathing problems at all,” said Michael Phelps.

 

“I haven’t noticed anything,” added fellow swimmer Dara Torres.

 

U.S. Olympic Committee President Peter Ueberroth noted on Wednesday that Los Angeles battled smog during the 1984 Olympics that he organized. He was right about that, and I remember wondering how the women marathoners managed to run 26 miles in the heat and pollution. But manage they did.

 

Beyond that, the smog has been really bad on one day – Monday – since I got here last Saturday. It was clear that day, slightly hazy on Sunday, socked in on Monday, clear as a bell on Tuesday. Today started out very hazy and ended relatively clear.

 

The bottom line here is that I have yet to find anyone who’s had trouble breathing. I walk a couple of miles a day, and I’ve felt the heat but haven’t had trouble with the air. It’s a big story now because we’ve little else to write about, but it won’t affect the competition.

 

The USOC and athletes were far more eager to talk about the facilities provided by Beijing and China. They are unabashedly agog at all of it.

 

“This is the best facility I’ve ever competed in,” said Phelps.

 

“I think China’s done an awesome job,” said Torres, who said she brought her own pillow to Beijing because she wasn’t sure what she’d find in the Olympic Village. The pillow’s in a closet.

 

“It’s like you’re at a Marriott,” she said.

 

Olympic officials are diplomatic by nature. They’ll never trash the facilities at an Olympics. Instead, they’ll say things like, “We have no complaints with the facilities,” which is code for, “This place really stinks.”

 

There was no code when the top officials in the USOC spoke with the media on Wednesday. The chef de mission, Charles Lee, called the facilities “truly extraordinary.”

 

“I stand in awe to see what they’ve done,” said Ueberroth.

 

That’s all you hear from everyone. The Olympic Village is the best ever. The venues are the best ever. The food is to die for. The hosts are bubbling over with graciousness and eagerness to help.

It’s all because of China and Beijing, which can spend money as they wish and build facilities where they want them. If it means relocating a million people, they can do that. There are no permit processes, no environmental impact statements, no labor unions to battle.

 

The Chinese people seem enormously proud of all of it. And even without impact statements, the facilities are the greenest in the history of the games. The city’s gotten new roads and a brand-new and badly needed subway in the bargain. It all fits in with the concept of the group being more important than the individual, a foundation stone of life here that has stood firm for thousands of years.

 

No other city could pull off such a feat, Ueberroth said. He sounded envious.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

It's interesting to hear a new and fresh view of china.
Recently, all we see and hear is how bad the air is and how uncertain the situation will be.
I guess we do need to look at china in a no-biased and friendly way.
Thanks for the honest comments.

Dear Mike:
I read your articles daily and do not seem to see too many comments.  Maybe, you are too positive about
China and Beijing Olympics ?
We visited The Silk Rd including Kashgar in 2006, Tibet in 2007 and Inner Mongolia in May 2008 and come back with wonderful impressions. We were especially impressed by what look like a genuine religious expression for Tibetian Budhism by ordinary
Chinese young peoples.
You don't look Chinese but are you Chinese? CTTV reporter?
Mike, I read the five articles of your August blog, and I feel like: Tomorrow this guy will write about something he doesn't like. I'm at the same time a bit worried and expecting, that is. I have been reading intensively these months news written by world media, and your blog is really something that I can't believe I'm reading. What I'm trying to say is, it seems this is your first time in China, and when you see more and deeper, you'll form a more let's say complete picture. I'm secretly praying by then your articles will still be like these.

Sure people must have read these articles, but I didn't see a single comment.  That makes me think.

I'm not trying to criticise you or something. Your articles just make me homesick. I'm Chinese and I lived in Beijing for 12 years.
This is the most positive and objective reporting on Beijing Olympics I've read in a long time. Thanks Mike! Always love to read your insights.
What other "developing nation" has the wealth to spend over $50 BILLION dollars on the Olympics?  Developing nation?  Ha!  The US government has a $490 billion dollar deficit.  The Chinese government has a revenue surplus of over $1 TRILLION.  Why does the WTO grant China "developing nation" status?
Open Mike, thank you very much for all the positive comments about China in preparing for this game.  It's always good to hear comment after a person have been there personally other than the rest of those comments to boycutt BeiJing just for political issues.  Sports and politics are different, people, please don't tie them together....
The Chinese should be proud of their hard work.  They worked hard, accomplishing so much in a short period of time.  Sure they could have done it sooner, but who's to complain?  Good job, China, and thank you. <3
Great article Mike! All I wanted to say is haters will always hate. Regardless of what someone do or try, haters will judge with their hatre. It's not like our house (USA) is 100% pollution free, not like our house is 100% poverty free, and last but not least it's not like we have a bunch of saints running our country either. One word said it all when it come to Americans and that's "HYPOCRITE". How can we talk bad about their pollution when our LA and NY are one of the pollution leader in the world? how can we acknowledge their poverty problem when we have homeless folks all over our highway underbridge? and last I checked our politicianers are as corrupt as can be. They range from bribery, and to spending our tax on high dollars prostitution etc etc...you name it.
However, I do need to acknowledge one thing and that's our FOUNDATION. Our forefather had build a great great great foundation/political system where if carry out correctly can be the best of the world. Which they did for America first 200 yrs or so. However, it we're departing from that foundation at an exponential rate. We need to get back to our root!!!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://openmike.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1249729